Talent and Opportunity - Always Being In Demand
Sunday, November 28, 2010 at 7:37AM It has been a little while since I have posted anything and while the holidays seasons will make that more challenging I will be blogging more often.
One of the more interesting discussions of late has been the increase in the demand for talent within our local area: the silicon valley. While there is a generally high unemployment rate overall, typically mentioned at being around 11% or so, talented individuals are very much in demand. This had been written about in several blogs and captured nicely in GigaOM. My own personal inbox has been swamped with opportunities with inquiries and recruitment being markedly on the rise. Even recruiter and placement professionals whom I know have mentioned how "crazy" the demand for talent is with some opportunities offering good salaries and great talent being very difficult to find.
Often times in my professional career I am asked by others how do they "become talented"? In truth everyone is talented, they have valuable skills that can be of benefit to any organization. The issue is how to communicate that value and at the same time, understand how that value would be perceived by an organization. Typically for any number of reasons people confuse what the term value actually means. They akin it to accomplishments, tasks, duties, etc. None of these are the measure of someone's value to an organization. They are in fact results or outcomes.
There are many ways for a professional to understand their value such as reviews with your management. However that sometimes may not be easily determined. What I have found useful is to sit back and reflect on the following question: "What would the organization miss or find lacking if I were to suddenly be absent?" Or another way to look at it is ask yourself "Why would anyone want to hire me into an organization?"
This takes a lot of really deep introspection because many professionals do not understand the difference between what they do and what value in what they do brings to an organization. For example while it is true you may be very good at core project management skills, being an outstanding project manager in and of itself is not valuable to an organization. However what they accomplish with their skills and experience for the organization is considered valuable. Note the comment "with their skills and experience" which is very individualized.
In the high tech field there is a constant need to be abreast of changes, understand them, and find the proper mix of experience and learning to create new solutions that benefit the organization. Being able to deliver effective solutions under tight deadlines, minding costs, and with a certain innovative/entrepreneurial flair is what almost every high tech company wants in their staff. Bright, open, creative minds delivering just awesome solutions.
Interestingly in existing legacy organizations while this is desired incumbents also see that talent is a dangerous competitor to their position within the company. Talent is noticed quickly, rises quickly, and moves quickly typically faster than incumbents are comfortable with. Hence in many legacy organizations talent is quelled, creativity squashed, and solutions marginalized due to incumbent belief that talent poses a threat to what they considered "time-in-grade rewards" or "legacy rewards". After all someone who has put in say 10years at a company feels a certain level of entitlement at least so I have been told.
I counter that such a viewpoint makes a legacy organization not only a bad place to work, but makes the organization as a whole lose their competitive edge. Not wanting to compete or never having to means that those professionals lose their skills to adapt, learn, and compete in the broader market. As a result their solutions are of lower quality and less capability which creates dissonance with their customers who in turn start looking for other alternate suppliers. This starts to affect an organization in terms of market position and ultimately revenue.
Interestingly doing projects with such enthusiasm is very noticeable and infectious. This is why individuals such as recruiters or key decision makers in other organizations reach out to such individuals on a regular basis. They are so enthusiastic and passionate about what they are doing that it shows to others in their industry and in their areas of interest. Typically from a quick poll of professionals that I consider talented, they typically receive opportunity contacts even in the latest recession averaging about 6 quality contacts a week. By "quality contacts" I mean empowered decision makers who are capable of making a hire/no-hire decision after face-to-face and phone conversations. Recently these same individuals have gone from 6 quality contacts a week to about 12 to 18 a week.
Being talented in my opinion means not just being smart and insightful, but also being open-minded, accepting of change, and committed to taking risks to do things that will make an impact to people's lives. These traits are why some of the most successful companies have some of the best mechanisms to attract, retain and grow talent for the benefit of their customers, partners, employees, and shareholders.

